DeployWhere

Render vs Vercel

Compared on regions, free tier and company location.

Render and Vercel are compared on company location, European datacenter regions, free tier and US CLOUD Act exposure. Render is based in United States. Vercel is based in United States. Both offer a free tier. Pricing appears only after a person has reviewed it, and no ordering here is paid for.

Category
Platform as a service
Frontend hosting
Company based in
🇺🇸 United States
🇺🇸 United States
European regions
🇩🇪 Germany
🇿🇦 ZA, 🇺🇸 United States, 🇦🇪 AE, 🇮🇪 Ireland, 🇩🇪 Germany, 🇭🇰 HK, 🇬🇧 United Kingdom, 🇨🇦 Canada, 🇮🇳 India, 🇯🇵 Japan, 🇫🇷 France, 🇧🇷 Brazil, 🇰🇷 KR, 🇸🇬 Singapore, 🇸🇪 Sweden, 🇦🇺 Australia
GDPR agreement
Available
Available
US CLOUD Act
US company
US company
Free tier
Free workspace, static sites, web services, Postgres databases and Key Value instances are available, with service-specific limits.
Hobby is free for personal, non-commercial web applications and projects.
Pricing verified
Yes
Yes

Render

Render hosts static sites, web services, private services, background workers, databases, cron jobs and workflows. Billing combines a workspace subscription with usage-based compute and metered features such as bandwidth. The sources list native runtimes including Node, Python, Go, Rust, Ruby and Elixir, plus custom Docker containers.

Full Render details

Vercel

Vercel provides web application deployment with managed compute, serverless functions, global CDN delivery, and application security. It offers Hobby, Pro, and custom-priced Enterprise plans, with included allocations and usage charges for managed infrastructure. Compute uses Fluid compute with Active CPU pricing, and some resources are priced by region.

Full Vercel details

Related comparisons